– # –

1-800 Contacts, Inc. v. Steinberg ^[1]
(2003, 2d District – 107 Cal.App.4th 568, 132 Cal.Rptr.2d 789)Plaintiff sued Steinberg for business damages, alleging that Steinberg had colluded with plaintiff’s former employee to promote legislative action adverse to plaintiff’s business by facilitating meetings between the former employee and representatives of professional associations. The trial court granted Steinberg’s anti-SLAPP motion to strike the entire complaint on the grounds that the cause of action was conduct “in furtherance of free speech or petition in connection with a public issue” and plaintiff had not demonstrated a probability of prevailing on its complaint, including counts of inducing breach contract and inducing breach of fiduciary duties. The appellate court affirms.569 East County Boulevard LLC v. Backcountry Against the Dump, Inc. ^[2]
(2016, 4th District – 6 Cal.App.5th 426, 212Cal.Rptr.3d 304)(modified 12-29-16)1100 Park Lane Associates v. Feldman ^[3]
(2008, 1st District – 160 Cal.App.4th 1467, 74 Cal.Rptr.3d 1)

1550 Laurel Owner’s Assn., Inc. v. Appellate Division of Superior Court ^[4]
(2018, 2d District – 28 Cal.App.5th 1146, 239 Cal.Rptr.3d 740)

 

The information on this website is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. The information here is meant to provide general information to the public.