Mark Goldowitz’s expertise has been recognized in four Court of Appeal opinions.
Lucania v. Anderson
Division Two of the First District Court of Appeal:
“Mr. Goldowitz’s undisputed expertise and his specialization in anti-SLAPP litigation could properly be considered by the trial court to justify a higher rate of charge than might ordinarily seem appropriate.” (A095922/097146, non-pub. opn., 12/13/02, slip opn. at p. 12.)
Church of Scientology v. Wollersheim
Los Angeles Superior Court, No. BC074815, the Second District Court of Appeal, Division Three:
“Mr. Goldowitz was shown to be a specialist in First Amendment and anti-SLAPP litigation.” (E019258, 8/17/98, p. 31.)
Coltrain v. Shewalter
Riverside Superior Court, No. 278681, the Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division Two:
“Mr. Goldowitz was shown to be a specialist in First Amendment and anti-SLAPP litigation.” (E019258, 8/17/98, p. 31.)
City of Norco v. Norco News
Riverside Superior Court, No. 245962, Court of Appeal:
“it was appropriate to have a specialist in First Amendment issues associated with local counsel.” (E015764, 9/11/96, p. 6.)