Fighting SLAPPs, Protecting the First Amendment
Cite as: 286 F.Supp.2d 1118
COMPETITIVE TECHNOLOGIES, et al., Plaintiff(s)
v.
FUJITSU LIMITED, et al., Defendant(s)
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
No. C-02-1673 JCS
Feb. 25, 2003
CORRECTED ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN … Read the rest
Cite as: 286 F.Supp.2d 1118
COMPETITIVE TECHNOLOGIES, et al., Plaintiff(s)
v.
FUJITSU LIMITED, et al., Defendant(s)
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
No. C-02-1673 JCS
Feb. 25, 2003
CORRECTED ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN … Read the rest
The following are opinions issued by the California Supreme Court concerning the anti-SLAPP statute (CCP § 425.16). Clicking on the name of the case will lead to the text of the opinion. For opinions issued in and after 2014, clicking … Read the rest
PENINSULA GUARDIANS, INC., Plaintiff and Respondent,
v. PENINSULA HEALTH CARE DISTRICT, Defendant and Appellant.
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE A126056
Filed: October 21, 2011
SUBSEQUENT HISTORY:
The Publication Status of this Document has been Changed … Read the rest
Beginning today, the California Anti-SLAPP Project will highlight some of the top stories on the web discussing California’s anti-SLAPP law. CASP’s SLAPP Blog will not only be a resource for lawyers and the general public to read in depth analyses … Read the rest
GEORGE B. ADAMS, individually and dba JMS BOTTOM OF THE FIFTH SPORTS BAR, Plaintiff,
vs. JAMES TRIMBLE, Chief, Benicia Police Department, et al., Defendants.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10084
Case … Read the rest
[Print_link]
U.S. WESTERN FALUN DAFA ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
CHINESE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, Defendant and Appellant.
Nos. A115535, A116307.
May 30, 2008.
Certified for Partial Publication.FN*
FN* Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rules 8.1105 and 8.1110, parts
Opinions in the U.S. District Courts concerning the California Anti-SLAPP Statute (CCP § 425.16):
Alfasigma USA, Inc. v. First Databank, Inc.
United States District Court, N.D. California. … Read the rest
MANUFACTURED HOME COMMUNITIES INC., a corporation,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al.,
Defendants – Appellees.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
269 Fed. Appx. 627; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 5364
February 7, … Read the rest
Mark Goldowitz’s expertise has been recognized in four Court of Appeal opinions.
Lucania v. Anderson
Division Two of the First District Court of Appeal:
… Read the rest“Mr. Goldowitz’s undisputed expertise and his specialization in anti-SLAPP litigation could properly be considered by the
Cite as: 376 U.S. 254, 11 L.Ed.2d 686, 84 S.Ct. 710
The New York Times COMPANY, Petitioner,
v.
L. B. SULLIVAN.
Ralph D. ABERNATHY et al., Petitioners,
v.
L. B. SULLIVAN.
Nos. 39, 40.
Supreme Court of the … Read the rest
RAINING DATA CORPORATION, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MARIO BARRENECHEA, Defendant and Appellant.
G040902
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE
175 Cal. App. 4th 1363; 97 Cal. Rptr. 3d 196
June … Read the rest
The following cases are selected landmark decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court on First Amendment protections of petition and public speech. While there is not a federal anti-SLAPP law, the U.S. Supreme Court has issued opinions on several cases with … Read the rest
Edward v. Ellis
(2021, 4th District – 72 Cal.App.5th 780))
Yang v. Tenet Healthcare Inc.
(2020, 4th District – 48 Cal.App.5th 939, 262 Cal.Rptr.3d 429)
Yeager v. Holt
(2018, 3d District – 23 Cal.App.5th 450, 232 Cal.Rptr.3d 693)
Yee v. Cheung
(2013, 4th District – 220 Cal.App.4th 184, 162 Cal.Rptr.3d … Read the rest
Taheri Law Group v. Evans
(2008, 2d District – 160 Cal.App.4th 482, 72 Cal.Rptr.3d 847)
Takhar v. People ex rel. Feather River Air Quality Management Dist.
(2018, 3d District – 27 Cal.App.5th 15, 237 Cal.Rptr.3d 759)
Padres L.P. v. Henderson
(2004, 4th District – 114 Cal.App.4th 495, 6 Cal.Rptr.3d 584)
The owners of the Padres baseball club filed claims for malicious prosecution against attorney Henderson arising from a series of lawsuits Henderson had filed challenging actions … Read the rest